Vanguard's non-apology apology

Reader comment on: Vanguard Backs Down

Submitted by J.Johnson (United States), Oct 27, 2010 10:03

Note, please, the last sentence: "I regret if some readers have interpreted the posting as representing a partisan point of view." Translation: Damn, its too bad you folks are so dumb that you can't understand that my partisan rant wasn't really a partisan rant.

Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.

Other reader comments on this item

Title By Date
And got the following reply to "Who is Steve Utkus?" [67 words]cthulhuOct 28, 2010 18:48
I responded to their email with "Who is Steve Utkus" [146 words]cthulhuOct 28, 2010 18:46
⇒ Vanguard's non-apology apology [44 words]J.JohnsonOct 27, 2010 10:03
↔ A smart company with a consumer focus does not take public positions [65 words]LyleOct 27, 2010 10:49

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Vanguard's non-apology apology by J.Johnson

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.