More money does not imply more education

Reader comment on: Taxing the 'Rich'
in response to reader comment: Teachers, firefighters and police provide more value

Submitted by Rick Caird (United States), Nov 29, 2010 09:20

Ben is arguing more money implies a better education. Yet, we have shown over the past 50 years that more money is pretty much irrelevant to the education supplied. There is no linear relationship to the amount spent on public functions and a corresponding increase in both the efficiency and the quantity of the so called public good.

Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.

Submit a comment on this article

Other reader comments on this item

Title By Date
Teachers, firefighters and police provide more value
[w/response] [47 words]		benNov 28, 2010 19:59
↔ ⇒ More money does not imply more education [58 words]Rick CairdNov 29, 2010 09:20
↔ "more value"?? [19 words]BrettNov 29, 2010 11:38
↔ An economy of lackeys and dogwalkers [200 words]NotCommieNov 30, 2010 09:00
↔ "...massive production for the masses..." [84 words]BrettDec 1, 2010 08:41
↔ Walmart. So far, a retailer is not a producer. [71 words]NotCommieDec 2, 2010 07:08

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to More money does not imply more education by Rick Caird

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.