Walmart. So far, a retailer is not a producer.

Reader comment on: Taxing the 'Rich'
in response to reader comment: "...massive production for the masses..."

Submitted by NotCommie (France), Dec 2, 2010 07:08

Pardon my English. I used the word "industry" in the old sense (=Secondary sector, or production of actual goods). Walmart does not "produce" anything. Walmart is just a middleman between producer (mostly foreign, not creating any jobs here) and consumer. It only sells what it buys, and creates jobs in China. (an eastern dictature, without any worker's right and very poor, with a per capita GDP lower than El Salvador ).

Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.

Submit a comment on this article

Other reader comments on this item

Title By Date
Teachers, firefighters and police provide more value
[w/response] [47 words]		benNov 28, 2010 19:59
↔ More money does not imply more education [58 words]Rick CairdNov 29, 2010 09:20
↔ "more value"?? [19 words]BrettNov 29, 2010 11:38
↔ An economy of lackeys and dogwalkers [200 words]NotCommieNov 30, 2010 09:00
↔ "...massive production for the masses..." [84 words]BrettDec 1, 2010 08:41
↔ ⇒ Walmart. So far, a retailer is not a producer. [71 words]NotCommieDec 2, 2010 07:08

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Walmart. So far, a retailer is not a producer. by NotCommie

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.