Free speech: It's not just for porn anymore

Reader comment on: A Big Victory for Free Speech

Submitted by john Lilly (United States), Jan 21, 2010 23:55

Pretty much what the title says. Why was the gov't ever trying to regulate political speech?! I mean, given the existence of the First Amendment...


Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.

Submit a comment on this article

Other reader comments on this item

Title By Date
Roberts FEC Entrepreneurship [118 words]PatAug 23, 2010 12:35
Where is all the anger at the activist court?!? [21 words]benJan 22, 2010 10:18
So bribery and corruption are protected free speech? [41 words]DoowopJan 22, 2010 08:20
campaign finance reform [80 words]willisJan 22, 2010 08:07
Corporations versus political parties [83 words]LarryHJan 22, 2010 05:57
"Although they make enormous contributions to our society, corporations are not actually members of it." [33 words]cthulhuJan 22, 2010 00:03
⇒ Free speech: It's not just for porn anymore [25 words]john LillyJan 21, 2010 23:55
If you don't want to be known as a backer of something then be quiet.
[w/response] [110 words]
LyleJan 21, 2010 18:57

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Free speech: It's not just for porn anymore by john Lilly

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.