Before the smart phone:

Reader comment on: Apple Versus the FBI

Submitted by lyle (United States), Feb 18, 2016 21:00

One might have kept an appointment book with calls schedules and the like. That would have been seized, and read. I believe diaries were/are also subject to seizure. So the question becomes if the smart phone is the modern diary, then does it deserve more protection than its paper and ink predecessor? Peoply say they keep their entire life there, but before the smartphone lots of diaries and daytimers were used. Now it may be that you put things into the smart phone that you would never have put to paper before but then how did you remember.

It is just like the question for messages is take the precedent of first class mail and apply that (the issues with first class mail have been well litigated)


Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.

Other reader comments on this item

Title By Date
apple v. FBI [72 words]Douglas LeveneFeb 18, 2016 22:28
⇒ Before the smart phone: [127 words]lyleFeb 18, 2016 21:00
Disingenuousness by Cook [269 words]John GillisFeb 18, 2016 18:35
Compelling work [104 words]Mark HendersonFeb 18, 2016 17:40

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Before the smart phone: by lyle

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.