Instead of repealing Sarbanex-Oxley...
Reader comment on: Republican Presidential Debate
Submitted by David B. Schlosser (United States), Aug 12, 2011 08:49
... why not make Congress subject to the law? That would solve our problems pretty qiuck, since all 535 members would be in prison tout de suite. I agree it's a bad law - but we could make some good come of it.
Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.
Submit a comment on this article
Other reader comments on this item
| Title |
By |
Date |
| Regarding the value of compromise ... [66 words] | Ritchie The Riveter | Aug 13, 2011 10:16 |
| Really? [187 words] | JimmyT | Aug 12, 2011 09:45 |
| ⇒ Instead of repealing Sarbanex-Oxley... [43 words] | David B. Schlosser | Aug 12, 2011 08:49 |
| Wow! I agree with this analysis [137 words] | JohnRDC | Aug 12, 2011 08:31 |
| Better Take-Aways [212 words] | Granus | Aug 12, 2011 08:03 |
| Tea Party [74 words] | Puddin | Aug 12, 2011 06:58 |
| 2012 is no minor correction to the ship of state. [133 words] | Tom Perkins | Aug 12, 2011 06:39 |
| Paul is no dove [122 words] | Allan Ripley | Aug 12, 2011 05:58 |
| ↔ Wisdom [29 words] | john | Aug 12, 2011 18:58 |
| re: mandate [119 words] | expat | Aug 12, 2011 03:33 |
| Still whistling past the graveyard, I see. [19 words] | Some Guy | Aug 12, 2011 03:07 |
| ↔ Power Vacuum [104 words] | M. Simon | Aug 12, 2011 08:47 |
| ↔ We're on the same page, here ... [37 words] | Ritchie The Riveter | Aug 13, 2011 10:54 |
Comment on this item
