You're on to Something
Reader comment on: The War on For-Profit Education
Submitted by ross crawford (United States), Nov 15, 2010 21:06
Ira, good work, but you could strengthen the way your fact sets are presented, and if you do, you may well find the bigger scandal is in the traditional halls of ivy, which I've not seen scrutinized as Ms. Lewin has done to the for-profits. Your leap to Bloomberg is well placed.
Places to investigate include growth in compensation and benefits for staff and profs versus growth in tuition, value of tax exempt status of real estate and physical assets, decline in average profs teaching hours and shrinkage of class days (teaching load reduction) at many of the not for profit schools.
Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.
Submit a comment on this article
Other reader comments on this item
|⇒ You're on to Something [102 words]||ross crawford||Nov 15, 2010 21:06|
|Federal Funding for Private Companies [38 words]||Bob||Nov 15, 2010 14:01|
|They actually pay taxes [60 words]||BTN||Nov 15, 2010 11:27|
|Conflict of Interest? [357 words]||J.Johnson||Nov 15, 2010 11:12|
|Unnecessary Obfuscation [221 words]||John Beck||Nov 14, 2010 23:27|
|For profit article based on ideology, not reality [138 words]||D. Melvil Dewey||Nov 14, 2010 06:42|
|Really off base here [68 words]||Penn6020||Nov 12, 2010 23:41|
|Thank you.... [269 words]||Marlon R. Graves||Nov 12, 2010 19:26|
|Earned??? HAH! [22 words]||WhoProfits||Nov 12, 2010 16:51|
Comment on this item