You're on to Something

Reader comment on: The War on For-Profit Education

Submitted by ross crawford (United States), Nov 15, 2010 21:06

Ira, good work, but you could strengthen the way your fact sets are presented, and if you do, you may well find the bigger scandal is in the traditional halls of ivy, which I've not seen scrutinized as Ms. Lewin has done to the for-profits. Your leap to Bloomberg is well placed.

Places to investigate include growth in compensation and benefits for staff and profs versus growth in tuition, value of tax exempt status of real estate and physical assets, decline in average profs teaching hours and shrinkage of class days (teaching load reduction) at many of the not for profit schools.

Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.

Submit a comment on this article

Other reader comments on this item

Title By Date
⇒ You're on to Something [102 words]ross crawfordNov 15, 2010 21:06
Federal Funding for Private Companies [38 words]BobNov 15, 2010 14:01
They actually pay taxes [60 words]BTNNov 15, 2010 11:27
Conflict of Interest? [357 words]J.JohnsonNov 15, 2010 11:12
Unnecessary Obfuscation [221 words]John BeckNov 14, 2010 23:27
For profit article based on ideology, not reality [138 words]D. Melvil DeweyNov 14, 2010 06:42
Really off base here [68 words]Penn6020Nov 12, 2010 23:41
Thank you.... [269 words]Marlon R. GravesNov 12, 2010 19:26
Earned??? HAH! [22 words]WhoProfitsNov 12, 2010 16:51

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to You're on to Something by ross crawford

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.