Reader comment on: Thoughts on the CNN/Tea Party Debate
Submitted by Canadian Republican (Canada), Sep 12, 2011 23:02
I agree with much of what has been said here but I must digress on what you say about Paul's foreign policy.
From the rest of the world, it would seem he is 100% correct. The CIA specifically listed American involvement in the Middle East as a top reason for the 9/11 attacks. Osama did the same.
Ron Paul is the only American politician with the courage to speak sense about 9/11 - and I say this as a completely neutral outsider. I fear for this country when he is booed for speaking the truth, while the drones of the Military-Industrial complex continue to murder civilians in the middle east in the greatest ever expression of "big government run amok"
Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.
Submit a comment on this article
Other reader comments on this item
|but such a waste of time/effort... [91 words]||david milliken sr||Sep 13, 2011 17:34|
|Nice Summary [58 words]||PRJoslin||Sep 13, 2011 09:18|
|Paul's foreign policy bad? [139 words]||Chrisray||Sep 13, 2011 01:15|
|↔ Paul's foreign policy bad? [46 words]||Tom||Sep 13, 2011 10:19|
|↔ free trade restricted by foreign policy, really? [113 words]||Steve B||Sep 13, 2011 13:12|
|↔ They hate us for our virtues [42 words]||Harry Binswanger||Sep 26, 2011 17:25|
|A well-run campaign [44 words]||smokin' joe||Sep 13, 2011 01:12|
|performance issue [67 words]||Duke||Sep 13, 2011 00:08|
|⇒ Foreign Policy [120 words]||Canadian Republican||Sep 12, 2011 23:02|
|↔ Foreign Policy - disagree with you [143 words]||Steve B||Sep 13, 2011 12:58|
Comment on this item