Foreign Policy - disagree with you

Reader comment on: Thoughts on the CNN/Tea Party Debate
in response to reader comment: Foreign Policy

Submitted by Steve B (United States), Sep 13, 2011 12:58

As much as I dislike President Obama, he is correct to use the drones in a targeted way and has killed quite a few Al-Qaeda leadership in the process. For all his rhetoric (and apologies), he has followed President Bush's lead and maintained an active offensive. Although the majority of Americans are tired of war, I think most recognize that our actions overseas hunting down Al-Qaeda and disrupting their leadership has kept them from mounting another attack on our shores. Ron Paul is wrong. When given the choice between ignoring Al-Qaeda and then having to play defense after getting hit at home (pre-9/11) and being proactive such as we are doing (post-9/11), I'll choose our current path every time. Ron Paul wants to turn the clock back, and the more he sounds like Michael Moore on the issue, the less credibility he has.


Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.

Submit a comment on this article

Other reader comments on this item

Title By Date
but such a waste of time/effort... [91 words]david milliken srSep 13, 2011 17:34
Nice Summary [58 words]PRJoslinSep 13, 2011 09:18
Paul's foreign policy bad? [139 words]ChrisraySep 13, 2011 01:15
Paul's foreign policy bad? [46 words]TomSep 13, 2011 10:19
free trade restricted by foreign policy, really? [113 words]Steve BSep 13, 2011 13:12
They hate us for our virtues [42 words]Harry BinswangerSep 26, 2011 17:25
A well-run campaign [44 words]smokin' joeSep 13, 2011 01:12
performance issue [67 words]DukeSep 13, 2011 00:08
Foreign Policy [120 words]Canadian RepublicanSep 12, 2011 23:02
⇒ Foreign Policy - disagree with you [143 words]Steve BSep 13, 2011 12:58

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Foreign Policy - disagree with you by Steve B

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.