A well-run campaign
Reader comment on: Thoughts on the CNN/Tea Party Debate
Submitted by smokin' joe (United States), Sep 13, 2011 01:12
Can't say I agree about campaign performance being presidential barometer. After all, one of the President's primary qualifications for the office was the efficiency of his presidential campaign(which is a myth, but another matter) we were constantly told. And look how he turned out.
Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.
Submit a comment on this article
Other reader comments on this item
| Title |
By |
Date |
| but such a waste of time/effort... [91 words] | david milliken sr | Sep 13, 2011 17:34 |
| Nice Summary [58 words] | PRJoslin | Sep 13, 2011 09:18 |
| Paul's foreign policy bad? [139 words] | Chrisray | Sep 13, 2011 01:15 |
| ↔ Paul's foreign policy bad? [46 words] | Tom | Sep 13, 2011 10:19 |
| ↔ free trade restricted by foreign policy, really? [113 words] | Steve B | Sep 13, 2011 13:12 |
| ↔ They hate us for our virtues [42 words] | Harry Binswanger | Sep 26, 2011 17:25 |
| ⇒ A well-run campaign [44 words] | smokin' joe | Sep 13, 2011 01:12 |
| performance issue [67 words] | Duke | Sep 13, 2011 00:08 |
| Foreign Policy [120 words] | Canadian Republican | Sep 12, 2011 23:02 |
| ↔ Foreign Policy - disagree with you [143 words] | Steve B | Sep 13, 2011 12:58 |
Comment on this item
