Shallow

Reader comment on: Shlaes on Inflation

Submitted by jim haughey (United States), Jul 18, 2014 18:11

This discussion of inflation is extraordinary shallow -it relies only on random antedotes and never discusses any of the points made in the criticism of Shales initial article on inflation. Journalists should stick to words ans avoid numbers,


Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.

Submit a comment on this article

Other reader comments on this item

Title By Date
Call it whatever you want? Who cares.. [84 words]JHXJul 19, 2014 22:45
gas prices? [9 words]laughJul 19, 2014 13:41
You won't see what you never look for. [72 words]Scott BJul 19, 2014 12:15
Agreeing with Krugman [14 words]Robert LukitschJul 19, 2014 07:48
Shlaes conclusions confirm EVERYONE'S personal experience [188 words]epaminondasJul 19, 2014 05:58
The publishing of critism [257 words]David LundJul 18, 2014 20:18
The publishing of critism [257 words]David LundJul 18, 2014 18:51
⇒ Shallow [38 words]jim haugheyJul 18, 2014 18:11
Economic Revisionism [39 words]Max PlanckJul 18, 2014 17:46
Shlaes is an economic naif [41 words]Paulie the KJul 18, 2014 17:45
Cost of Living vs CPI [110 words]Paul from SAJul 18, 2014 17:36
aren't you cherry picking? [100 words]Paul JJul 18, 2014 17:04
Long vs short [139 words]RockyJul 18, 2014 14:39
doing the math [50 words]John GillisJul 17, 2014 17:58
Doing the math correctly [45 words]Bitter ClingerJul 18, 2014 15:24
Thanks [12 words]John GillisJul 18, 2014 15:52
I blame American schools
[w/response] [65 words]
Hywel MorganJul 18, 2014 16:34
Huh? [36 words]Bitter ClingerJul 19, 2014 08:36
Mea culpa [87 words]Hywel MorganJul 20, 2014 11:46
Newstand prices [45 words]Jerry SkurnikJul 17, 2014 17:40
pocket pain [37 words]hectorJul 18, 2014 18:22

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Shallow by jim haughey

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.