Congress doesn't really declare war anymore anyway

Reader comment on: Schumer Versus The First Amendment
in response to reader comment: Elections have changed a bit

Submitted by ben (United States), Nov 24, 2011 21:26

Wars have changed, and declarations of war these days are few and far between. Of course, everything has changed since the founders. The constitution is not a document meant to be bronzed, it is a living document whose interpretation changes with the times. Sometimes, when the text falls behind the times it needs updating (see the abolition of slavery). It is possible the text of certain parts are just fine in today's world, but other parts need fixing. Campaign finance clearly needs fixing so we avoid becoming a country where the one percent dominate elections (we already are pretty close to that point), I don't think the declaring war does.

My choice of the word "activist" was merely to point out the hypocrisy of those on the right who abhor activist judges who overrule the decisions of elected representatives only when those rulings go against them.


Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.

Submit a comment on this article

Other reader comments on this item

Title By Date
Tweaking of First Amendment [117 words]Gina PryorNov 26, 2011 22:17
Amendments are as American as apple pie
[w/response] [234 words]
benNov 23, 2011 20:08
Elections have changed a bit
[w/response] [51 words]
benNov 23, 2011 22:59
FOC I agree with you here [73 words]Orange thunderNov 24, 2011 20:05
⇒ Congress doesn't really declare war anymore anyway [146 words]benNov 24, 2011 21:26
What's the point? [123 words]MattNov 28, 2011 06:30

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Congress doesn't really declare war anymore anyway by ben

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.