Going back a bit further:
Reader comment on: A Weak Argument Against Trump
Submitted by Lyle (United States), Feb 26, 2016 18:32
The inherited wealth idea (and marrying wealth) would have ruled out Washington, Jefferson, Madison, and Monroe. as they all inherited (and also in Washintons case married wealth, Martha was worth more than George when they married, most of the slaves on the plantation were hers).
Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.
Submit a comment on this article
Other reader comments on this item
| Title |
By |
Date |
| Trump and inherited wealth [76 words] | Harry Binswanger | Mar 1, 2016 14:07 |
| ↔ Trump may be no Objectivist but Binswanger misrepresents him [222 words] | Mark Hunter | Mar 9, 2016 20:16 |
| ↔ Reply to Mark Hunter on Trump [15 words] | Harry Binswanger | Mar 21, 2016 10:01 |
| Maybe...but not so fast [92 words] | Marc Segan | Feb 27, 2016 10:24 |
| On the other hand... [31 words] | Samgr | Feb 27, 2016 05:22 |
| Agreement, with a condition [134 words] | David Moran | Feb 26, 2016 21:26 |
Performance matters
[w/response] [95 words] | Duane Hershberger | Feb 26, 2016 19:59 |
| Inheritance [73 words] | James b | Feb 26, 2016 19:10 |
| ⇒ Going back a bit further: [45 words] | Lyle | Feb 26, 2016 18:32 |
| Re. A weak Argument Against Mr. Trump [44 words] | Nadia Diab | Feb 26, 2016 17:50 |
Comment on this item
