Reply to Mark Hunter on Trump
Reader comment on: A Weak Argument Against Trump
in response to reader comment: Trump may be no Objectivist but Binswanger misrepresents him
Submitted by Harry Binswanger (United States), Mar 21, 2016 10:01
Mark Hunter attempts to smash down my letter's points. Unfortunately for me, he succeeds. :)
Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.
Submit a comment on this article
Other reader comments on this item
| Title |
By |
Date |
| Trump and inherited wealth [76 words] | Harry Binswanger | Mar 1, 2016 14:07 |
| ↔ Trump may be no Objectivist but Binswanger misrepresents him [222 words] | Mark Hunter | Mar 9, 2016 20:16 |
| ↔ ⇒ Reply to Mark Hunter on Trump [15 words] | Harry Binswanger | Mar 21, 2016 10:01 |
| Maybe...but not so fast [92 words] | Marc Segan | Feb 27, 2016 10:24 |
| On the other hand... [31 words] | Samgr | Feb 27, 2016 05:22 |
| Agreement, with a condition [134 words] | David Moran | Feb 26, 2016 21:26 |
Performance matters
[w/response] [95 words] | Duane Hershberger | Feb 26, 2016 19:59 |
| Inheritance [73 words] | James b | Feb 26, 2016 19:10 |
| Going back a bit further: [45 words] | Lyle | Feb 26, 2016 18:32 |
| Re. A weak Argument Against Mr. Trump [44 words] | Nadia Diab | Feb 26, 2016 17:50 |
Comment on this item
