Inheritance

Reader comment on: A Weak Argument Against Trump

Submitted by James b (Thailand), Feb 26, 2016 19:10

I was struck in the same way. Rubio sounded almost as if he believes the state is against inheritance, as he is one of its representatives. Isn't that a Progressive plank? Isn't that also a viscious anti human sentiment which tends to erode wealth and savings and therefore familial prosperity and the prosperity of the whole society? Everyone need not be yoked by the state from birth or have family savings stripped away.

Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.

Submit a comment on this article

Other reader comments on this item

Title By Date
Trump and inherited wealth [76 words]Harry BinswangerMar 1, 2016 14:07
↔ Trump may be no Objectivist but Binswanger misrepresents him [222 words]Mark HunterMar 9, 2016 20:16
↔ Reply to Mark Hunter on Trump [15 words]Harry BinswangerMar 21, 2016 10:01
Maybe...but not so fast [92 words]Marc SeganFeb 27, 2016 10:24
On the other hand... [31 words]SamgrFeb 27, 2016 05:22
Agreement, with a condition [134 words]David MoranFeb 26, 2016 21:26
Performance matters
[w/response] [95 words]		Duane HershbergerFeb 26, 2016 19:59
⇒ Inheritance [73 words]James bFeb 26, 2016 19:10
Going back a bit further: [45 words]LyleFeb 26, 2016 18:32
Re. A weak Argument Against Mr. Trump [44 words]Nadia DiabFeb 26, 2016 17:50

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Inheritance by James b

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.