Answer the question.
Reader comment on: The Politics of Bin Laden
in response to reader comment: Religion and rationalism: enemies of mankind
Submitted by Doug Pitt (Ecuador), May 5, 2011 20:40
It is no surprise at all that you hit on all points around the main issue and then spuriously claim irrationality on my part as valid excuse for running away with your tail between your legs. The last thing you want, is to have a bright light shone on your complete inability to devise a positive viable plan of action.
What is the end game? We follow your guidance and do get "The President ...(to) ...vehemently oppose Sharia law," and we then end up, where? Passing through what, on the way? What about terrorist recruitment, that has risen dramatically among all the husbands, brothers & sons of the dead or maimed from the US wars of conquest in central Asia. The geographical invasion is a fait accompli. Now the US, as you desire, lectures them on what legal system they should choose. With what moral authority? With what real repercussions?
Cut out the jeering tone of superiority and answer the questions Richard, or else admit (by running away) that you simply haven't thought it through.
Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.
Submit a comment on this article
Other reader comments on this item
|RnBram [141 words]||Richard Bramwell||May 2, 2011 18:06|
|↔ American Jihad? [205 words]||Doug Pitt||May 4, 2011 15:56|
|↔ you reall should read the Quran [204 words]||RnBram||May 4, 2011 17:09|
|↔ I read the Koran. I did not pick over it. [323 words]||Doug Pitt||May 4, 2011 21:33|
|↔ Religion and rationalism: enemies of mankind [389 words]||RnBram||May 5, 2011 16:47|
|↔ ⇒ Answer the question. [175 words]||Doug Pitt||May 5, 2011 20:40|
|↔ Darn, I had checked Email Me & and submitted without unchecking it [536 words]||RnBram||May 5, 2011 22:20|
|↔ As expected -- can't answer the question. [111 words]||Doug Pitt||May 6, 2011 21:16|
|↔ Bramwell is a Fascist Propagandist [280 words]||Doug Pitt||May 10, 2011 22:31|
Comment on this item