clearly misrepresented
Reader comment on: Obama on Gibbs Pay
Submitted by john (United States), Jan 5, 2011 20:08
he obviously meant that the pay was modest relative to mr. gibbs worth, or what he could/should be making elseware given his experience, education, etc. what a pathetic post.
Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.
Submit a comment on this article
Other reader comments on this item
Title |
By |
Date |
6 years [89 words] | jtide | Jan 8, 2011 08:29 |
24/7 [219 words] | orange thunder | Jan 6, 2011 07:58 |
⇒ clearly misrepresented [29 words] | john | Jan 5, 2011 20:08 |
A 'Relatively' Arrogant Thing to Say [44 words] | JeffH | Jan 5, 2011 16:22 |
It is a lot of money [43 words] | Anonymous | Jan 5, 2011 15:15 |
Reading is Fundamental [32 words] | xyz | Jan 5, 2011 15:14 |
clarification [65 words] | Chad | Jan 5, 2011 14:49 |
↔ Relative but earned? [101 words] | Larry | Jan 5, 2011 20:04 |
I think what he meant was [72 words] | Lily Ng | Jan 5, 2011 14:48 |
Hourly Factor [64 words] | Dubs | Jan 5, 2011 14:34 |
Misleading... [99 words] | Sam | Jan 5, 2011 14:29 |
Read carefully [65 words] | reader1 | Jan 5, 2011 14:29 |
TIL [9 words] | Jason Allen | Jan 5, 2011 14:12 |
↔ Big word but not that hard... [21 words] | Ty_Law | Jan 5, 2011 14:59 |
relatively [45 words] | m4ximusprim3 | Jan 5, 2011 14:11 |
Comment on this item