Why would it cost more in 2010?
Reader comment on: Krugman and Obama on Infant Nutrition
in response to reader comment: WIC
Submitted by editrix (Israel), Feb 20, 2011 04:53
Why would it cost more? Is this is a serious question? In 2010 the country was still suffering from a huge recession and massive unemployment. In 2000 we weren't. Obviously, a great many more people have joined the rolls, which accounts for your disingenous inclusion of "middle income" people in the program. Middle income- before they lost their jobs. Now they're "no income" people.
Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.
Submit a comment on this article
Other reader comments on this item
Title |
By |
Date |
the elephant in the room [w/response] [95 words] | davesnot here | Feb 22, 2011 10:12 |
WIC [w/response] [148 words] | Vince | Feb 18, 2011 23:48 |
↔ ⇒ Why would it cost more in 2010? [64 words] | editrix | Feb 20, 2011 04:53 |
↔ Twice more sounds about right [66 words] | Not to sure but... | Feb 20, 2011 19:34 |
Questions [136 words] | Andy C | Feb 18, 2011 15:57 |
↔ Inflation, income and abuse [152 words] | Shannon Love | Feb 18, 2011 17:14 |
↔ Good point [104 words] | Andy C | Feb 18, 2011 21:12 |
↔ WIC [w/response] [112 words] | Vince | Feb 18, 2011 23:57 |
↔ Rich isn't numeric [98 words] | Shannon Love | Feb 19, 2011 00:28 |
↔ re: WIC [126 words] | Jill C | Feb 21, 2011 18:06 |
It's hard to help without hurting [214 words] | Shannon Love | Feb 18, 2011 14:19 |
I'm ashamed [92 words] | Brian C. | Feb 18, 2011 12:36 |
What a surprise [17 words] | deepelemblues | Feb 18, 2011 11:22 |
↔ Apples to apples [78 words] | jwg | Feb 18, 2011 14:35 |
Comment on this item