Twice more sounds about right
Reader comment on: Krugman and Obama on Infant Nutrition
in response to reader comment: WIC
Submitted by Not to sure but... (Malaysia), Feb 20, 2011 19:34
@Future of Capitalism:
Twice more does sound about right, once you take in population growth - typically of how many pregnant people there are now compared to 2000 - and the effects of long-term inflation. I don't think it's right to say that these cuts are logical by pure assumption that both US population growth and global commodity prices are stagnant.
Btw, i'm not an American
Note: Comments are moderated by the editor and are subject to editing.
Submit a comment on this article
Other reader comments on this item
| Title |
By |
Date |
the elephant in the room
[w/response] [95 words] | davesnot here | Feb 22, 2011 10:12 |
WIC
[w/response] [148 words] | Vince | Feb 18, 2011 23:48 |
| ↔ Why would it cost more in 2010? [64 words] | editrix | Feb 20, 2011 04:53 |
| ↔ ⇒ Twice more sounds about right [66 words] | Not to sure but... | Feb 20, 2011 19:34 |
| Questions [136 words] | Andy C | Feb 18, 2011 15:57 |
| ↔ Inflation, income and abuse [152 words] | Shannon Love | Feb 18, 2011 17:14 |
| ↔ Good point [104 words] | Andy C | Feb 18, 2011 21:12 |
↔ WIC
[w/response] [112 words] | Vince | Feb 18, 2011 23:57 |
| ↔ Rich isn't numeric [98 words] | Shannon Love | Feb 19, 2011 00:28 |
| ↔ re: WIC [126 words] | Jill C | Feb 21, 2011 18:06 |
| It's hard to help without hurting [214 words] | Shannon Love | Feb 18, 2011 14:19 |
| I'm ashamed [92 words] | Brian C. | Feb 18, 2011 12:36 |
| What a surprise [17 words] | deepelemblues | Feb 18, 2011 11:22 |
| ↔ Apples to apples [78 words] | jwg | Feb 18, 2011 14:35 |
Comment on this item
